Design in mind...

How many times have I heard "I don't like that colour?" or "can you try it in a different font?" or "I think that line would look better reversed out of orange"? Or even "I don't like that pic". Countless times. I may have even uttered those words myself!
Design can be such a personal thing. An external manifestation of your thoughts, feelings, aesthetic sensibilities and what makes you tick. Even when you have a set of brand guidelines, they are still subject to your own interpretation. So when I hear these kind of remarks - it kinda bums me out. But am I being too sensitive? Am I taking things too personally? Do I need to take a step back and be more objective? I came across this site which gives you the chance to read "opinions on corporate and brand identity work". It makes for some interesting reading.
I typed "What is good design?" into Google and this caught my eye: Taste For Makers
I've no idea who this guy is, but he makes some good points and raises some interesting questions. He writes:
Saying that taste is just personal preference is a good way to prevent disputes. The trouble is, it's not true. You feel this when you start to design things.
Whatever job people do, they naturally want to do better. Football players like to win games. CEOs like to increase earnings. It's a matter of pride, and a real pleasure, to get better at your job. But if your job is to design things, and there is no such thing as beauty, then there is no way to get better at your job. If taste is just personal preference, then everyone's is already perfect: you like whatever you like, and that's it.
I'll get me coat then. Seriously though, what do other people think? Is design subjective or is there only ever one true way?
Steve Tse


Comments
If aesthetics were simply a matter of personal subjectivity, then there would be no qualitative difference between Shakespeare's 'Hamlet' and 'Gone with the Wind'- the musical. Which is probably what John Keats was aiming at when he wrote 'Beauty is truth, truth beauty — that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'
(Whether poets make good copywriters is possibly a further subject for discussion.)
Posted by: Barry Evans | April 29, 2008 11:20 AM
I tend to think of at least 2 kinds of design: functional design, and aesthetic design. Functional design is extremely important and not very subjective. Aesthetic design is fairly subjective and not terribly important.
I made the mistake of reading Donald Norman's, THE PSYCHOLOGY OF EVERYDAY THINGS, which taught me to recognize just how badly designed most of the world is. I go on vacation and find I can't open the doors of the sun room in the rented cottage. Or operate the microwave. Or work the TV, which has 3 remotes, each with 45 buttons. Bad functional design costs the world trillions of pounds per year. Bad aesthetic design is just ugly.
In print design, it's much less obvious what is functional and what's aesthetic. But if these are explicitly defined, then we'll all learn what matters and what is simply a matter of taste. To borrow an architectural metaphor: let others fuss over the colour of the wall paper; your job is to make sure they don't replace any load-bearing walls with paper screens because they give it a nice 'Japanesey' feeling.
Posted by: Brad Bell | April 29, 2008 02:17 PM
Ok, Ok. I can take a hint - especially one as blunt as this!
Posted by: Francesca Boardman | April 29, 2008 04:01 PM