« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 29, 2007

The winning donkey

alex.jpg We first tested DRTV for the Brooke last summer – with limited success, but there were promising signs. While the campaign didn’t meet all its targets it was responsive; that gave us something to build on. So in February and March this year we ran creative tests – a version with a male voiceover, new music and a different ending. Sure enough, the new ad beat the control, and the summer campaign has been a runaway success! You might have read about the production process here – now click below and watch the winning ad!

Alex Wordsworth

October 26, 2007

Simpler suppression

hannah.jpg

Have you ever been confused by data suppression reports when all you really want to know is how many records you have left to mail? Read on…

One of Whitewater's sister companies, Push Button, has created a new package specially for you - they call it CSS (Charity Suppression Service). CSS includes all the current licensed stop files (Mortascreen, NCoA, USS (Universal Suppression Service), disConnect/reConnect, Purity) as permanent match suppressions, and The Bereavement Register and GAS as temporary matches (permanent matches for these two would be charged at an extra cost). Both NCoA and reConnect can be used for tracking.

Temporary matches are usually run on cold lists. Permanent matches would be run to flag records as deceased/gone away etc on a database, so that the same record won't be selected again for future mailings.

Using CSS will save you money - you'll pay a reduced charge per match. Push Button are also offering a free Health Check service on house or donor file, so our clients will be able to see the potential benefits of their service at no initial cost.

The disadvantage? Your report will only show the total number of supressions, not a detailed breakdown per stop file. But that's why you'll pay less!

Now I know data suppression isn't everyone's idea of good conversation... but if you want to talk about this more, you know where to find me.

Hannah White

October 24, 2007

A campaign with a clown's face

helenh.jpg

We've been working with the RSPB for five years now, producing regular warm appeals for this conservation charity with over 1 million members. Often the focus is on land purchase, since a key part of their strategy is to acquire and manage critically important wildlife habitats - the best way of securing their preservation for future generations. In October 2006 we produced a breathtaking appeal pack for Sutton Fen, which went on to win a prestigious IOF award.

Successful as such land purchase campaigns can be, there's a need to ring the changes. Chris Madden, our client, is always on the hunt for the right RSPB project to fundraise for. Recently, we turned our attention to issues relating to the marine environment.

The RSPB has been involved in marine conservation for many years - the UK's seas and coastline are of international importance to seabirds which use them for nesting, over-wintering and feeding. Over half the UK's total bird population depend on our seas.

Whitewater was asked to produce a quick-turn around appeal mailing, mailing in July, based on the need for a Marine Bill to be included in this autumn's Queen's speech. Such a Bill has been promised but, as we all know, politicians sometimes need to be held to their promises. This was also an opportunity to communicate with members about RSPB's campaigning work, to help them understand the link between membership subscriptions, ad-hoc donations and other areas of RSPB's work.

The problem with an appeal based on such a vast habitat and range of wildlife is the likely lack of focus. Too large an objective can lack the tangibility that we know donors want. The appeal needed a recognisable and iconic species to give it emotional leverage. We know that the puffin is one of the UK's top three ‘most-loved’ birds. So the puffin it was – to act as a kind of spokesperson for its own kind.

RSPB pack shot

The pack had a joint fundraising and campaigning ask (send a campaign card to PM Gordon Brown) and even offered a cute puffin pin badge as an (optional) reply incentive – which increased response by 15% across segments.

We've had many successes now on campaigning asks for a range of clients (a route that, just three or four years ago, many clients were reluctant to test). This was another. At the last count, income is 30% up on target and rising, average donation is 20% higher than usual and over 2,000 lapsed donors have been reactivated - whoopee! Clearly we're not the only ones who find the puffin's clown face truly engaging. Now lets just keep an eye on Gordon - and that he remembers his promise in the Queen's speech.

Helen Hamilton

October 12, 2007

Smashing TV targets

richardh.jpg

The TV ad we developed to promote the RSPCA's fantastic legacy product - Home for Life – absolutely demolished its targets in the first month on air. Watch it and see why!

Richard Halliday

October 08, 2007

Do you iGoogle?

lucy.jpg The internet was supposed to make things easier and quicker - yet I still never have time to keep up-to-date on everything that's important to me. As someone who juggles their time between work, a small child, managing a kitchen extension and keeping up with friends and family, iGoogle has been a bit of a discovery for me.

For those who haven't tried it yet, iGoogle offers a personalised homepage, giving at-a-glance access to key information on the web. On my homepage I've added feeds from most of the websites I used to regularly access - so from one page, I can now keep an eye on news headlines, charity sector updates, my clients’ website traffic (and how they are being perceived across the web), my Hotmail account, my Facebook profile and several essential parent and kitchen related sites.

Has this changed the way I used the web? Yes. I would never have had time in a single day to check all these websites - now, just by visiting my homepage, I can.

Is that change of behaviour relevant to marketeers and charities trying to build their online relationship with donors - absolutely.

How does a charity take advantage of this change in behaviour and make sure they are on their donors and prospects homepages? By being clever with their web content and offering information feeds of relevant and interesting daily updates.

Lucy Morrell

October 01, 2007

What's web 2.0 trying to say?

brad.jpg It seems to me that Web 2.0 is telling us it's time to talk with supporters, not at them.

It's no secret that broadcast TV is losing viewers to the internet. People are turning away from a device which broadcasts one-way messages at them, to one where they can have conversations. On the internet, we can ask questions and share opinions - TV can't provide that kind of active involvement.

There's no escaping it: TV is a 'talk-at' tool. Communication is one-way; it wouldn't be TV if you could ask it a question and expect some kind of response. While broadcast media is 'talk-at', the telephone is an early example of a 'talk-with' tool - for obvious reasons.

The point of the distinction is that most communications media fall easily into the 'talk-at' or 'talk-with' categories, and charities can use this distinction to foster a dialogue with supporters. Or rather, charities can avoid opting for 'talk-at' tools without considering whether they've neatly ensured that it's impossible for supporters to talk with them.

In the charity world, we're seeing the transition from one major donor demographic to another, from Dorothy Donor to the Baby Boomers. One key difference between Dorothy and the Boomers is that Dorothy didn't mind being talked at. She trusted and respected authority. Her media choice was - and largely still is - newspapers, radio and TV. With the exception of the telephone, 'talk-at' media (mass, broadcast media) was all there was.

In contrast, Boomers are typically described as more individualistic and less trusting of authority. They want accountability. They want to ask questions. But they can't do that when the institution or organisation they want answers from will only communicate through the one-way messaging of talk-at media.

So it seems there is a confluence of trends: Dorothy Donor is happy to listen while she is talked-at, her children, the Boomers, want a conversation. There is a general migration from talk-at media to the talk-with tools of the internet. And Web 2.0 means that the explosion of talk-with tools made possible by the internet are becoming much more powerful, easier to use, more democratic and more community-oriented.

In my next post, I'll talk (with you) a bit more about talk-with media, and how we can take any medium and make it more Boomer-friendly. See you there.

Brad Bell