What's the big secret?

What do people hate about charities? Direct mail appeals from charities they haven't given to. They throw them in the bin. And when they moan to their friends about charity direct mail, their friends agree, because they throw them in the bin as well. Why do charities waste their money sending direct mail appeals when everybody throws them in the bin?
It's a huge issue for charity fundraisers - not talking in response terms, because we know that direct mail appeals work; otherwise we wouldn’t send them, would we?
But the vast majority of people who throw appeals in the bin don't know that they work. All they know is that they throw them in the bin and so do all their friends. This wouldn't matter much if we were selling credit cards, cars or gardening equipment, because the recipients couldn't give a damn if commercial organisations waste money. But they do care, very much, if they think charities are wasting donations.
And that reflects badly on all of us. Despite knowing that our audience think we're wasting money, we keep bombarding them with direct mail appeals because a small percentage of them respond and make it worth our while.
But we don't tell them that.
Perhaps you don't think it's important what non-responders think, as long as the responders make it worthwhile to keep mailing.
But long-term, it does us no favours at all. Those people who throw away our mailings aren't just 'not interested', or 'giving to another charity', or 'haven’t had the right ask yet'. They are beginning to actively distrust us because they believe we are wasting donated money. And they will tell their friends.
Let’s do something about it before it's too late. From now on, let's print something like this on all our recruitment outer envelopes:
ABOUT THIS MAILING: [Charity name] relies on public donations and we use mailings like this to inform people about the work we do, and ask for their support. These appeals are designed as economically as possible. To print and post this to you has cost us XXp and, although not everyone who receives one will respond to it, it is still an extremely cost-effective way of raising funds to help [cause]. In fact, over XX% of our income comes from appeals like this one.
Think it's a dumb idea? Think it's a great idea? Tried it already? Got a question? Let me know - post a comment below.
Nick Couldry


Comments
It seems a sensible suggestion that we print this or perhaps other 'health warnings' on our mailings. I would liken it to the sort of messages on tobacco packaging. We read these messages - we may want to ignore them but they have a way of getting through to us. Just what we need to combat the negative junk mail image. Could this be the start of some joined up thinking? ....
Posted by: Andy Renals | November 8, 2006 04:20 PM
This is really a 'brand' issue - public perception of charities and to the dm industry as a whole. But as a dyed in the wool direct marketer, I'd love to see if and how it affects response. Clients I've talked to just want to do it, but if someone tests it and gest an uplift, everyone will do it and the public will get the message even quicker. Got any cold activity coming up Andy?
Posted by: nick couldry | November 9, 2006 08:38 AM
I LOVE this idea. When I joined an agency specialising in fundraising as a Copywriter in 2004, I remember reading in the press that transparency had to be the 'next big thing' for charities. Now whilst I don't believe everything I read in the papers, I do believe that this kind of statement could only do good. It's just a question of having the guts to try something new. Even though it's hard to see how this could backfire.
Posted by: Ben | November 14, 2006 11:04 AM
Have you tested it?
Posted by: Jeff Brooks | November 18, 2006 05:55 PM
Hi Jeff - Nick is out of the office this week, so I'm replying in his absence.
We haven't done a split test, but I know Nick is keen to get quantitative findings. We don't suggest this approach will necessarily lift response (if it makes the public feel less negative toward charity DM, then it is worth doing) - but it would certainly be interesting to see if it does!
The perception of DM in the UK at the moment is so negative, and this is such a positive message, that we often recommend that clients just 'go for it'. Our client The Brooke has experimented with including messages about how much a piece has cost to produce, and how it will help them raise funds - and received extremely positive feedback. Other clients now include similar clauses on all donor mailings.
Posted by: Anna Crofton | November 20, 2006 11:14 AM